About Me

Name: Charlie Pillar
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Huckaboom

Another Republican debate. As I watch Mike Huckabee with his "awe shucks" style he remainds me of a neighbor I used to have. If I was working in the yard I would always be gladto see him coming toward me, walking his dog. He was easy going, sociable, always had a good story or the right line. Would I like Mike Huckabee for my neighbor, Sure! Would I like Mike Huckabee for my President. Not so much.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From Front Page Magazine The Democratic-Iranian Plan for Iraq

 
The Democratic-Iranian Plan for Iraq
By Andrew Walden
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 8, 2007

With the Congressional reauthorization of funding for Iraqi operations just days old, Democrats, their media, and Iran are already beginning a summer offensive aimed at achieving Islamist victory in Iraq by the only means possibleturning American public opinion towards surrender.

A May 25 AP article by Anne Flaherty explains the Democrat strategy:

In the months ahead, lawmakers will vote repeatedly on whether U.S. troops should stay and whether Bush has the authority to continue the war. The Democratic strategy is intended to ratchet up pressure on the president, as well as on moderate Republicans who have grown tired of defending Bush administration policy in a deeply unpopular war. ‘I feel a direction change in the air,’ said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., chairman of the House panel that oversees military funding.

Parallel to the Democrat strategy, the May 22 UK Guardian reports Iran is also planning a summer offensive.

Iran is secretly forging ties with al-Qaida elements and Sunni Arab militias in Iraq in preparation for a summer showdown with coalition forces intended to tip a wavering US Congress into voting for full military withdrawal, US officials say.

“Iran is fighting a proxy war in Iraq and it's a very dangerous course for them to be following. They are already committing daily acts of war against US and British forces,” a senior US official in Baghdad warned. “They [Iran] are behind a lot of high-profile attacks meant to undermine US will and British will, such as the rocket attacks on Basra palace and the Green Zone [in Baghdad]. The attacks are directed by the Revolutionary Guard who are connected right to the top [of the Iranian government].”

The official said US commanders were bracing for a nationwide, Iranian-orchestrated summer offensive, linking al-Qaida and Sunni insurgents to Tehran's Shia militia allies, that Iran hoped would trigger a political mutiny in Washington and a US retreat. “We expect that al-Qaida and Iran will both attempt to increase the propaganda and increase the violence prior to Petraeus's report in September.”

The Democrats’ offensive is operating on exactly the same timetable. AP’s Flaherty explains:

The most critical votes on the war are likely to be cast in September when the House and Senate debate war funding for 2008. The House plans to consider one measure that would end combat by July 2008 and another intended to repeal Bush's authority to wage war in Iraq.

The September votes likely will come after Iraq war commander Gen. David Petraeus tells Congress whether Bush's troop buildup plan is working. Also due by September is an independent assessment of progress made by the Iraqi government.

“Those of us who oppose this war will be back again and again and again and again until this war has ended,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Can't quit in Iraq

The following is a letter to the editor published in the May 1 Philadelphia Inquirer:

Senator Reid has declared the Iraq War lost. Senator Shumer promised last week that is only a matter of time before Democrats get their way on troop withdrawal. Are we going to have April 1975 all over again?

Senators Reid and Shumer, you and I are old enough to remember how the Vietnam War ended. Remember the shameful sight of those outreached hands of our friends and allies as the last helicopters left the American embassy? The thousands killed, the reeducation camps, the plight of the boat people? And then there was the genocide in Cambodia. They called it the killing fields, remember that? I do not doubt that we would see similar suffering as a result of leaving a destabilized Iraq. Emboldened terrorists would destabilize governments in neighboring countries. I mean, after leaving Iraq would we really go back to save Kuwait or Jordan?

So Senators, fund the troops. If it all goes badly it's George W Bush’s war. If you persist in attempting to make this Vietnam all over again it wii be your defeat.

Charles Pillar

Wyncote, PA 19095

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What now, Senator Shumer?

 

February 22, 2007

Letter to the Editor

Syracuse Post Standard

In Tuesday’s (February 20) editorial you stated “Repeating the same mistake over and over and expecting success is supposed to define insanity, not foreign policy. Yet President Bush is sending more troops to fight a lost war in Iraq in defiance of public opinion, an electoral mandate last November, the judgment of his own study commission and now, a bipartisan vote by the House of Representatives.

Last week Senator Chuck Shumer said “There will be resolution after resolution, amendment after amendment... just like in the days of Vietnam. The pressure will mount, the president will find he has no strategy, he will have to change his strategy and the vast majority of our troops will be taken out of harm’s way and come home.”

So, the war is lost and we are to have another Vietnam. Let me ask, who, in there right mind, wants another Vietnam?

I cannot speak for the editorial staff of the Post Standard, but Senator Shumer and I are both old enough to remember how the Vietnam War ended. Chuck, do you remember the shameful sight of those outreached hands of our friends and allies as the last helicopters left the American embassy? The thousands killed, the reeducation camps, the plight of the boat people? And then there was the genocide in Cambodia. They called it the killing fields, remember that?

I do not doubt that we would see similar suffering as a result of leaving a destabilized Iraq. Emboldened terrorists would destabilize governments in neighboring countries. I mean, would we really go back to save Kuwait or Jordan?

Will the surge work? I pray that it does. If under General Petraeus our troops can truly fight and keep what they gain we have a chance. I also believe it is our last chance. If we loose here the American people will demand that we leave with as much honor as we can muster. They will be right and justified in that judgment.

So, Senator Shumer, what are you going to do now? Will you let General Petraeus have a chance or will you do everything you can stymie his efforts? Let me offer some advice. Say what you must, but let the troops go in and fund their efforts. After all, if it all comes up a cropper it was George W Bush’s war. If you persist in attempting to make this “just like in the days of Vietnam” I’ll be sure to remind people that it’s your defeat. And, as you can see, I have a long memory.

Charles S Pillar

charlespillar@yahoo.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »